Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Privileged Lives by Edward Stewart: What the Novelist Knew


Privileged Lives is a novel about the rich and powerful and what they do in the dark – perhaps out of boredom. Take note: this is a novel.

Written in a very thick book (500+ pages), published by Delacorte Press in New York, the novel is quite captivating until the very end.

But for writers, and would-be writers, attention is best placed on the background knowledge of the author about many things which enabled him to write the novel.

What did Edward Stewart know about? Secret Societies and what they do, their link to powerful lawyers; police procedural and where the law comes in; media and what media can do to perpetuate lies; arts and how arts can be used by the rich in their pecking order; HIV and ARC (AIDS-related complex), their symptoms and how they are acquired; gays and gay life; priests, their sex needs and providers; cocaine and other prohibited drugs and their effects on the body; the drug and its link to crime; psychiatrists and their practice; custom-made lipsticks and their chemistry; fashion and what’s not correct in fashion; commercial buildings unoccupied, their strategic positions, and connection to crimes; what weird things idle people enjoy to see in weird sex. Armed with all of these, the author was able to weave up a novel where each character stands out as real being in the mind of the reader.

If you like the book, it means you’ve learned from Edward Stewart something of every element that he had introduced, beginning with comments from the characters to what happens to the characters as an effect, and the over-all chemistry the story is leading to. You may not like the story to end from the pleasure of having been acquainted with the characters as though they are real.

What’s the one word we can use to describe his use of these elements if not realism? The author worked so hard to present a realistic story.

Unfortunately, the book doesn’t seem to have printouts after 1988. It is very obvious the book is an assault on those in power. This novel could be classified as minority literature since its publication appears restricted.  There was no single review on it – at least when it was published.

Delacorte Press is part of The Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc. Did someone call? In the Philippines it would appear like that. One call from the powerful and off, the book goes!

Some reviews of the novel appeared only after 10 years in 1999, but still scanty. This time it was published by Amazon.com. The reviewers, though just a handful, said they liked the book. Few reviewers imply scanty circulation or very few customers. But the book is truly riveting until the end. Find a copy and read!

Back to the background knowledge of the novelist, does it take every novelist to know that much? Not necessarily. It depends on your story. Just like any piece of writing, your novel can be as simple as you want, as long as it comes out realistic. Focus on something that you know very well, something you have experienced first-hand. Some writers, in fact had assumed the life of a prisoner since they wanted to write realistic stories from prison. But this is extreme. It is just being able to breathe, think, and live the life of your character.

Saleability is not a gauge for a good novel. There have been millions of books sold on saleability alone because they cater to the taste of the buyer. The fact that some novels employ a mix of realism and surrealism and get sold means that the adult mind is still a child hungering for the surrealist, an escape from reality.

Some examples of surrealism would be a hand walking on the floor, a piece of cake floating in air, someone appearing on horseback and then gone in a whisk. There are novels that have these examples and yet they become best-selling. It is not the kind serious writing as art would employ. Would you be happy if you are known to be writing in this fashion?

A beginning writer would best take care to begin writing from reality if he is serious about writing – and not write just where easy money comes. He can do this by being sensitive about so many things, learning about diverse lives, and experiencing their world, even vicariously. Then he can begin to write with credibility.

 

Time Bound: Escaping from Plagiarizing


One way to tell if you are committing plagiarism in writing a research-based article or even an opinion piece is in the number of sources you are using: too few or only one; and the time you spend on the source.

Unless you are critiquing something, if you spend so much time writing on the ideas contained in one book or one source, chances are you are plagiarizing.

Is the book open by your desktop computer? How long? How many sentences have you copied? How many paragraphs?

Remember that long quotes taken from a published source is considered plagiarism - which is why the emphasis on time. Are you copying too much material from one source and staying there too long? You have to use your own words in such a way that you don’t steal other people’s ideas. In research, it is called “collecting others’ flowers” and that’s not acceptable.

Let’s say you use the dictionary or the thesaurus for synonyms of every word written in the paragraph so that they become yours. Do they really become yours? Absolutely not! Neither is re-arranging the words in a sentence of some source.

The safest way out is to tackle topics that you are familiar with. And the closest to familiarization is studying the subject with as many sources as possible. The variety can give enough angles from which to view your topic. Then you can have a tenable grasp of it rather than a tunnel vision from one source or a few.

Because you now have a wider perspective, you can escape plagiarizing. It will be easier to use your own words rather than hinge on someone’s – word for word, punctuation mark by punctuation mark. More yet, your knowledge has grown on the subject, and what you write can contribute to the knowledge of others. It is because you can now add to what was already written, even if by way of affirming some aspect or negating some. You then have activated some continuing debate.

But if you simply copy, there’s no addition made but just a subtraction – from you! Plagiarized materials don’t contribute anything. They destroy the character of the one producing them.